View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
aquaeevee Forum contributor

Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 770 Location: just southwest of sod off, a little past sign say noobly people parking, 5 tics from the asylum
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:21 pm Post subject: i just realized my dmg could be used in such a way... |
|
|
that it can, with a few lines erased, go full nude. my question is how far can i go before it gets shot to hentai foundry?
if i kill mostly all the inside lines am i still allowed to put it on here under high N marking?
provided is a link to picture in question
(comment if you like please, thanks)
http://www.fanart-central.net/pic-721694.html _________________ with this frame of mind you better pray i never get a point of view gun, too late i just did. just pray i dont aim at you then! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
London Moderator

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 6474
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes. And a moderate nudity is (probably) good enough. _________________ [i][size=9]Go Yankees![/size][/i] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aquaeevee Forum contributor

Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 770 Location: just southwest of sod off, a little past sign say noobly people parking, 5 tics from the asylum
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ty london _________________ with this frame of mind you better pray i never get a point of view gun, too late i just did. just pray i dont aim at you then! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
London Moderator

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 6474
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
welcome _________________ [i][size=9]Go Yankees![/size][/i] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cstdenis Evil Overlord

Joined: 31 Dec 1969 Posts: 6490 Location: In the tubes.
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nudity is not necessarily porn. _________________ You will obey or molten silver will be poured into your ears. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aquaeevee Forum contributor

Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 770 Location: just southwest of sod off, a little past sign say noobly people parking, 5 tics from the asylum
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
true, it could get classed as erotica or any number of things. but with the way things are run in art sites, if you arnt sure about it, ask the mods before you post it. _________________ with this frame of mind you better pray i never get a point of view gun, too late i just did. just pray i dont aim at you then! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tyciol Newb

Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read that the Foundry was created when FAC stopped accepting more erotic content, it is neat to learn about history like this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Battou Photo Lucidity Admin

Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 3165 Location: Slapamonkey, NY
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Old thread is old, however this matter has reasently come up in staff discussions.
As of right now the policy is currently:
Imagery that is deemed permissable include:
[b]Nudity 1:[/b]
[list][*]Non sexual depiction of a solo male/female creature (human or otherwise)
[*]Non sexual depiction of a multiple male/female creatures with out contact (human or otherwise) I.E nude beach, public bath and the like[/list:u]
[b]Appropriate Sexual Content 1:[/b][list][*]Depiction of non nude holding, cuddling or kissing
[*]Non nude depiction of mild fetish material, I.E Panties, Homoerotica and the like.
[*]Non Nude contact with sexual organs that does not go below surface of clothing, I.E Female holding her own breasts, Male scratching in sleep and the like.[/list:u]
Imagery that is subject to review[size=18][b][color=red]*[/color][/b][/size]:
[b]Nudity 2:[/b]
[list][*]Non sexual depiction of a multiple male/female creatures (human or otherwise)
[*]Depiction of appropriate sexually suggestive images of a solo male/female creature (human or otherwise)
[*]Depiction of appropriate sexual contact between multiple male/female creatures (human or otherwise)
[/list:u]
[b]Appropriate Sexual Content 2:[/b]
[list][*]Depiction of partial or full nude holding, cuddling or kissing
[*]Partial nude depiction of mild fetish material, I.E Panties, Homoerotica ect
[*]Depiction of Non Nude contact with sexual organs that does go below surface of clothing, I.E Female holding her own breasts, Male scratching in sleep and the like.
[*]Depiction of solo Nude contact with sexual organs composed in a censorshop manor, I.E Female holding her own breasts to cover nipple, Male with open hands covering penis ect
[*]Depiction of multiple Nude male/female creatures (human or otherwise) contact with sexual organs composed in a censorshop manor, I.E secondary subject holding breasts to cover nipple, Secondary subject with open hands covering pubic aria ect[/list:u]
Imagery subject to immediate removal include:
[b]Inappropriate Nudity:[/b]
[list][*]Depiction of a male erection, [i]even if self-censored by the artist before submission[/i];
[*][i]Gratuitous[/i] depiction of explicit nudity, i.e. a depiction that focuses entirely on the subject's genetalia and nothing else;
[*]Explicit nudity in combination with urination, defecation, lactation, semenal fluid or vaginal fluid;
[*]Nudity combined with inappropriate Sexual Content (see below)[/list:u]
[b]Inappropriate Sexual Content:[/b]
[list][*]Depiction of sexual contact or sexual penetration between multiple subjects (e.g. "foreplay", "intercourse", or "yiff");
[*]Sexual penetration or gratification of any single subject (erotic toys or masturbation, "orgasm" or "spooge");
[*]Or any clear indication of the above, [i]even if self-censored by the artist[/i].[/list:u]
This policy is currently under review so it could change over the course of the upcomming weeks or months.
[size=18][b][color=red]*[/color][/b][/size] Imagery that is subject to review means, this is imagery that technically pushes the boundries and falls into the grey aria between nudity and pornography. Imagery that falls into this category could go either way. Wether they are permitted to remain or not will be reviewed and determined by site staff on an individual basis.
Additionally if it can be proven that a user is willing to compose and submit imagery that is subject to imeadiate removal could potentially result in automatic removal of imagery falling under the "subject to review" category with out question. _________________ [b]RPG[/b]-[i]n[/i]. A computer programing language designed for business reporting that generates specific programs from the users specifications.([b]R[/b]eport [b]P[/b]rogram [b]G[/b]enerator)[i]The American Heritage Dictionary[/i]
[u][url=http://www.photo-lucidity.com/user-Battou.php]Photo-Lucidity[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://www.fanart-central.net/user-battou.php]FaAC[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://www.funart-central.net/user-Battou.php]FuAC[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://forums.fanart-central.net/index.php]Joke of the day[/url][/u] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
London Moderator

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 6474
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...uhhh homoerotica should not be an example of a "fetish." _________________ [i][size=9]Go Yankees![/size][/i] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stratadrake Elder Than Dirt

Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 13721 Location: Moo
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="London"]...uhhh homoerotica should not be an example of a "fetish."[/quote]
One person's fetish is another's . . . (darnit, what's the opposite of a fetish?) _________________ Strata here: [url=http://www.nanowrimo.org/eng/user/242293]Nanowrimo[/url] - [url=www.fanart-central.net/user-Stratadrake.php]FAC[/url] - [url=http://stratadrake.deviantart.com]dA[/url] - [url=www.furaffinity.net/user/Stratadrake/]FA[/url]
[size=9]Disclaimer: Posts may contain URLs. Click [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TVTropesWillRuinYourLife]at your own risk.[/url][/size] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bowiegranap Very bored

Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
squick |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Battou Photo Lucidity Admin

Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 3165 Location: Slapamonkey, NY
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="London"]...uhhh homoerotica should not be an example of a "fetish."[/quote]
This is an issue with times changing. Fetishism in it's truest form is known as paraphilia or a type of mental disorder characterized by a preference for or obsession with unusual sexual practices other than in normal copulatory behavior. Homosexuality was at one time a category of disorder but was pulled from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders list of disorders, I'm not sure when but...still.
So, by the book, you are correct, But as far as I am concerned any sexual conduct that can be classified as an "aquired taste" is a fetish. _________________ [b]RPG[/b]-[i]n[/i]. A computer programing language designed for business reporting that generates specific programs from the users specifications.([b]R[/b]eport [b]P[/b]rogram [b]G[/b]enerator)[i]The American Heritage Dictionary[/i]
[u][url=http://www.photo-lucidity.com/user-Battou.php]Photo-Lucidity[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://www.fanart-central.net/user-battou.php]FaAC[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://www.funart-central.net/user-Battou.php]FuAC[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://forums.fanart-central.net/index.php]Joke of the day[/url][/u] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
London Moderator

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 6474
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you have any idea how offensive that is?
In this setting I do not care, but if you're rewriting the site rules there shouldn't be anything in there that categorizes homosexuality under "fetish," a word with negative connotations.
I don't see the need for that passage at all. Any explicitly sexual depictions, "fetish" or not, shouldn't be permitted. There's no need to single out "fetish" art from "normal" art. _________________ [i][size=9]Go Yankees![/size][/i] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Battou Photo Lucidity Admin

Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Posts: 3165 Location: Slapamonkey, NY
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="London"]Do you have any idea how offensive that is?
In this setting I do not care, but if you're rewriting the site rules there shouldn't be anything in there that categorizes homosexuality under "fetish," a word with negative connotations.[/quote] I made a point to state that what was written in that post by me was not set in stone. Additionally, I am not the one who writes the rules. As I noted in my following post, By the book you are correct. That will be noted and homosexuality will not be classified as a fetish when and if the site policy is altered in that reguard, technically it never was.
[quote="London"]I don't see the need for that passage at all. Any explicitly sexual depictions, "fetish" or not, shouldn't be permitted. There's no need to single out "fetish" art from "normal" art.[/quote]
Any explicitly sexual depictions are not permitted and have not been permitted since sometime in 2007, however it is not the explicit we are worried about, it's the implied that by all means can be inturprited as "normal" art.
The entire purpose of that passage was simply to say "I made a mistake and this is how I made it." _________________ [b]RPG[/b]-[i]n[/i]. A computer programing language designed for business reporting that generates specific programs from the users specifications.([b]R[/b]eport [b]P[/b]rogram [b]G[/b]enerator)[i]The American Heritage Dictionary[/i]
[u][url=http://www.photo-lucidity.com/user-Battou.php]Photo-Lucidity[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://www.fanart-central.net/user-battou.php]FaAC[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://www.funart-central.net/user-Battou.php]FuAC[/url][/u] - [u][url=http://forums.fanart-central.net/index.php]Joke of the day[/url][/u] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|